Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,403
USA v. Dwayne Sherman
as 23-2996
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DWAYNE W. SHERMAN
MRB Law LLC v. Drake et al
as 1:2023cv01434
Plaintiff: MRB Law LLC
Defendant: Quanisha Drake and Sherman T Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sherman v. Cottonwood Vending LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07474
Petitioner: Adam Sherman
Defendant: Cottonwood Vending LLC
Respondent: Aniello Zampella and Coindado LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wang v. Crestwood Equity Partners LP et al
as 1:2023cv08709
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Defendant: Crestwood Equity Partners LP, Roberts G. Phillips, Warren H. Gfeller and others
Perlow v. Crestwood Equity Partners LP et al
as 1:2023cv08635
Plaintiff: Jason Perlow
Defendant: Crestwood Equity Partners LP, Roberts G. Phillips, Warren H. Gfeller and others
Amin v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
as 1:2023cv04492
Plaintiff: Dr. Mahendra Amin
Defendant: NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
Amicus Curiae: The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Immigrant Rights Clinic at Morningside Heights Legal Service, Inc., Sabrineh Ardalan and others
Petitioner: Azadeh Shahshahani
O'Dell v. Crestwood Equity Partners LP et al
as 1:2023cv08594
Plaintiff: Ryan O'Dell
Defendant: Crestwood Equity Partners LP, Roberts G. Phillips, Warren H. Gfeller and others
In re: Matthew Phillips
as 23-13163
Petitioner: In re: MATTHEW SHERMAN PHILLIPS
Respondent: GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and others
Matthew PhillipsIn re: Matthew Phillips
as 23-13080
Petitioner: In re: MATTHEW SHERMAN PHILLIPS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?