Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Brouillette v. Sherman et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael D. Sherman, Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Guerrier v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01886
Defendant:
Target, Law Offices of Zarzaur & Schwartz PC, LVNV Funding LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Guerrier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sherman v. Franklin
as 5:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
William R. Sherman
Defendant:
Ana Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. State of Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , Sherman Norfleet , Clarence Muhammad and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama and John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Buford v. City Of Mobile et al
as 1:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
Lewis Bay Buford, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Mobile , Sherman E. Otis , Richard Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliff v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01868
Plaintiff:
Arthur I. Radcliff
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Birmingham Board of Education, Craig Weatherspoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
