Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Acy v. Family Dollars et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
James Antwone Acy
Defendant:
Family Dollars, Darius Scott, Planet Fitness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sherman v. DeJoy
as 3:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Janae Sherman
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, Respondent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherman et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2022cv01908
Plaintiff:
Michael Sherman and Modesta Sherman
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Wilkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01784
Petitioner:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
