Cases 1 - 10 of 351
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Citibank, N.A. v. Sims et al
as 1:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
Sheilah D. Sims
Garnishee:
Office Of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Do Not Pass Go LLC et al v. City of Rockford
as 1:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
Do Not Pass Go LLC, Next Step Recovery Homes Inc., Jason Ridley and others
Defendant:
City of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Do Not Pass Go LLC et al v. City of Rockford
as 3:2024cv50074
Plaintiff:
Do Not Pass Go LLC, Next Step Recovery Homes Inc., Jason Ridley and others
Defendant:
City of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Abbott Laboratories
as 1:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Sims
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sims v. Natron Corporation
as 1:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Tina Sims
Defendant:
Natron Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez v. McCray et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Fred F Perez
Defendant:
McCray, Shelton, Susan Shebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Shack et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Tawanda Shack, Butler, Grayson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. IDOC et al
as 4:2023cv04221
Plaintiff:
Danny Sims
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, . Baker, Ryan A Oelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. IDOC et al
as 3:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
Danny Sims
Defendant:
IDOC, Warden Baker, Ryan` A Oelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
