Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Sims v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv05428
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Sims
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sims v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv05334
Petitioner:
Glen Earl Sims
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bow Jax Inc v. Sims Vibration Laboratory Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bow Jax Inc and Bow Jax Inc
Defendant:
Sims Vibration Laboratory Inc, Steven C Sims and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. King County Washington et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
King County Washington and Ron Sims
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Stewart et al v. Chelan County et al
as 2:2008cv00403
Plaintiff:
Robert James Stewart and Island of Stewartsville
Defendant:
Chelan County, Douglas County, Adams County and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Silva v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv01447
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Silva
Defendant:
King County, Ron Sims, Reed Holtgeertz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sims v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01074
Petitioner:
Jerald Sims
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cross v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv00944
Plaintiff:
Daryl Cross
Defendant:
King County, Ron Sims, Reed Holtgeerts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Rahr et al
as 2:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Sue Rahr, Unnamed Deputy Sheriff #1, Unnamed Deputy Sheriff #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azpitarte v. King County et al
as 2:2007cv01998
Plaintiff:
Richard Azpitarte
Defendant:
King County, Ron Sims, Susan Rahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
