Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Solis et al v. Hilco Redevelopment LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02348
Plaintiff:
Antonio Solis, Juan Solis and Juan Rangel
Defendant:
Morgan/Harbour LLC, Commercial Liabilities Partners LLC, Hilco Redevelopment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Cook County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2020cv01467
Plaintiff:
Nicholis Solis
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, as Sheriff of Cook County, COUNTY OF COOK, IL, Cook County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leverson v. T. Solis et al
as 1:2019cv04208
Defendant:
T. Solis, A. Zygmunt, Y. Qayssar and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Leverson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Comissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv02166
Defendant:
Comissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Apolinur Solis
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Solis v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00726
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Tomas Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solis v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Georgina Solis
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiffs in re: Depakote v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs in re: Depakote , Susan Harris, Kelly Dawn Kelley and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earl v. Espejo et al
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Antonio Espejo , Juan Gali , Arturo Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv08406
Plaintiff:
Bobby D Byrd
Defendant:
Sherrif Tom Dart, Sgt John Doe, Sherrif Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
