Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ROMERO et al v. MIDWESTERN PET FOODS, INC.
as 3:2021cv00014
Defendant:
MIDWESTERN PET FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY LILL, DAVID STARNES, CRYSTAL FABELA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: MIDWESTERN PET FOODS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 3:2021cv00007
Defendant:
MIDWESTERN PET FOODS, INC. and NUNN MILLING COMPANY INC
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CARLSON, CHANLER POTTS, BRITTANY A. LEE and others
In Re:
MIDWESTERN PET FOODS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SHANDA MARSHALL, CHARLES FOSTER, HARVEY E. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00250
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHAW et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv02046
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NEUBERT, JASMINE FREEMAN, KIZZY STARNES and others
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER ESSURE INC., BAYER S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANN v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2018cv00176
Defendant:
"SECOND IN CHARGE" SHU, LARRY ALLEN, K. ARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Currently Unknown:
SHU LT.
John Does #1- #10 Names Currently Unknown:
SHU OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Starnes v. Superintendent
as 3:2014cv01926
Petitioner:
Jermarcus Starnes
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starnes v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01279
Plaintiff:
Brenda Starnes
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007mc00026
Plaintiff:
NANCY STARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
