Cases 1 - 10 of 680
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mundy v. Village of Summit et al
as 1:2024cv04277
Plaintiff:
William Mundy
Defendant:
Village of Summit, Sergio Rodriguez, Jerry Hurckes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vlietstra v. Starkey et al
as 1:2024cv03379
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Vlietstra
Defendant:
Eric M Starkey, Andrew Watts, Derek Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 4:2024cv04064
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
