Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tueros et al v. Urban Health Plan, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04525
Plaintiff:
Christina Tueros and Hermel Lopez
Defendant:
Urban Health Plan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DUNCAN v. THE PARK TAP AND GRILL et al
as 3:2020cv03886
Defendant:
MATTHEW FITZPATRICK, MICHAEL R. TUERO, HEILONGJIANG BARN, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Behlin v. Rite Aid Pharmacy Store et al
as 1:2018cv04335
Plaintiff:
Rahbu Behlin
Defendant:
Rite Aid Pharmacy Store, Victor Gonzalez, Malcial Tuero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Morillo-Vidal
as 12-4910
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alexis Vladimir Morillo-Vidal, AKA Vladimir Morillo and Cesar Tueros
Defendant - Appellant:
John Cartagena
Javier Tueros-De Lama v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73087
Petitioner:
JAVIER ANGELO TUEROS-DE LAMA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Javier Tueros-De Lama v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71990
Petitioner:
JAVIER ANGELO TUEROS-DE LAMA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
United States of America v. Morillo-Vidal et al
as 11-4347
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Cartagena and Cesar Tueros
Defendant - Appellant:
Vladimir Alexis Morillo-Vidal, AKA Vladimir Morillo
McKethan v. Faleski et al
as 9:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
William McKethan
Defendant:
P. Faleski, C. Tuero, J. Osterhoudt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuero v. Aaron Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
Jose Tuero
Defendant:
Aaron Brothers, Inc. and Michael Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
