Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wiggins v. Stover et al
as 3:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
LaMar Wiggins
Respondent:
Rick Stover, John Doe and Colette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vicente v. Wiggins et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Luis Vicente
Defendant:
Wiggins, Dougherty, Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yost et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Anne Yost, Henry Woody, Wanda Votaw and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wiggins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Kipp M. Wiggins
Defendant:
Kendra Chapman Owner of Good Eats, LLC doing business as Black Rabbitt and Correy Chapman Individually doing business as Black Rabbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiggins v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00437
Plaintiff:
Monica Lynette Wiggins
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Wiggins v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00452
Plaintiff:
Monica Lynette Wiggins
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Velasco v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Moore, Rembish, Makay and others
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
Monica Lynette Wiggins
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wiggins v. Kulhawik
as 3:2017cv01608
Plaintiff:
Dajuan Wiggins
Defendant:
Thomas Kulhawik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leftridge v. Drew et al
as 3:2016cv01468
Plaintiff:
Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Teresa Drew, Kenisha Wiggins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
