Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Meltabarger v. Browner et al
as 2:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Meltabarger
Defendant:
Weston Browner, Samuel Musick, Curtis Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koogler v. Vandergriff et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Ralph Koogler
Defendant:
David Vandergriff, Heather Cofer, Terrence Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes-Weston v. EPSV Investments, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv06115
Plaintiff:
Deanna Hughes-Weston
Defendant:
EPSV Investments, LLC, BBQ Holdings, Inc and Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNichols v. Weston et al
as 4:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Chase R. McNichols
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Weston and Mid-Continent Trucking Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Dale Davis v. Barry County, Missouri
as 3:2018cv05103
Plaintiff:
Martin Dale Davis
Defendant:
Barry County, Missouri, Naomi Daniel, Michael Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sekscinski v. City of Aurora, Missouri et al
as 3:2018cv05013
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Missouri , Richard Witthuhn and Weston Welch
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Sekscinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albright v. Lamb Weston, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02281
Defendant:
Lamb Weston, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Albright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Boyd , Dwight Shearod , DeLisa Shearod and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Weston Educational, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01713
Plaintiff:
Brittany Evans
Defendant:
Weston Educational, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
