Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moore v. Birmingham, City of, Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv01473
Plaintiff:
Andre Moore
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Alabama , A.C. Roper and Brian Spoonire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGee v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2016cv00896
Plaintiff:
Jarius McGee
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of , A.C. Roper and Kathy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Daniel Aguirre, Richard Haluska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopson v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al
as 2:2015cv01020
Plaintiff:
Michael Hopson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association , Scottie Allen Carrol, Allen Haulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
Lameco M. Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Nathan Elmore, Jeffery Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00862
Plaintiff:
George Rutledge
Defendant:
William Bell, A.C. Roper, Cathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Trammell et al
as 2:2013cv02108
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adam Tolbert
Defendant:
Martin Trammell, A.C. Roper and City of Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piazza v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Anthony Piazza
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , William Bell , A.C. Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. City of Birmingham et al
as 4:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Thompson
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, A.C. Roper, Terry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edison v. Birmingham, City of, Alabama et al
as 2:2009cv02106
Plaintiff:
Andrew G Edison, Jr
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Alabama, A.C. Roper and James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
