Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Kearse v. A.C.S. et al
as 1:2007cv05511
Plaintiff:
Jamal Kearse
Defendant:
A.C.S. and Brenda Michelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Labor Relations Board v. Champagne Drywall, Inc.
as 1:2007cv10811
Defendant:
Champagne Drywall, Inc., Champagne Drywall, Inc. and A.C.E. Wall Systems
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
KELLY v. A.C.S. INDUSTRIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63643
Plaintiff:
JOHN KELLY
Defendant:
A.C.S. INDUSTRIAL, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GALLAGHER et al v. A.C.S. INDUSTRIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63644
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M GALLAGHER and JUDITH GALLAGHER
Defendant:
A.C.S. INDUSTRIAL, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WEST et al v. A.C.S. INDUSTRIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63551
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WEST and ANDREA WEST
Defendant:
A.C.S. INDUSTRIAL, INC., EASTERN REFRACTORIES, CO., INC., FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BUTLER et al v. A.C.S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63098
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. BUTLER and OLIVIA BUTLER
Defendant:
A.C.S., INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ST. CLAIR et al v. A.C.S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63096
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ST. CLAIR and RITA C. ST. CLAIR
Defendant:
A.C.S., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
IN RE ACE INTERNATIONAL
as 04-1133
Appellant:
A.C.E. INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, INC.
Appellee:
JAMES E. ROGAN, DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
