Cases 1 - 10 of 5,440
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Appeal From The Decision Of The Special Education Appeals Panel (IDEIA)
A.R. et al v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03880
Plaintiff:
A.R., NAOMIS RIVERA SAEZ and LUIS OSCAR HERNANDEZ CRUZ
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., CLINTON A. TURNER, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Medical Malpractice
IN RE: SMITH
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Devon A.R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
DEVON A.R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLAWSON et al
as 3:2022cv01319
Plaintiff:
Deshon A.R. Smith
Defendant:
C/O1 Clawson, C/O1 Whitney, C/O1 Lawrnce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. CLAWSON et al
as 3:2022cv01318
Plaintiff:
Deshon A.R. Smith, Ternce Davis and David Rasiro
Defendant:
C/O1 Clawson, C/O1 Lawrnce, C/O1 J.J. Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CLAWSON et al
as 2:2022cv03209
Plaintiff:
DESHON A.R. SMITH
Defendant:
C/O1 CLAWSON, C/O1 WHITNEY, C/O LAWRNCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. CLAWSON et al
as 2:2022cv03165
Plaintiff:
DESHON A.R. SMITH, TERNCE DAVIS and DAVID RASIRO
Defendant:
C/O1 CLAWSON, C/O1 LAWRNCE, C/O1 J.J. BEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
