Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Burkeen et al v. A.R.E. Accessories, LLC
as 5:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Deana Burkeen and Timothy Burkeen
Defendant:
A.R.E. Accessories, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Perez v. Rodabaugh et al
as 3:2013cv01122
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Andrew Clyde Rodabaugh , A.R.E. Machine Products, Inc. and A.R.E. Machine Products, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Belsito Communications, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv06255
Plaintiff:
Belsito Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Dell, Inc., Dell Marketing, L.P., Dell Direct Sales L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAKE v. A.R.S. CHEESE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00412
Plaintiff:
JOAN LAKE
Defendant:
A.R.S. CHEESE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. , STUART ROSEN and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mireles v. A.R.S. Advanced Restoration Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv05206
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mireles
Defendant:
A.R.S. Advanced Restoration Solutions, Inc. , Joe Souza , Chad Golson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Evanston Insurance Company, et al v. Hearthstone of Sun City, LLC, et al
as 10-16079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
HEATHSTONE OF SUN CITY, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, HSC PROPERTY, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, UNISPEC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE TYLER, BARBARA ERNICO, ESTATE OF HENRY A. ERNICO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
