Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Steven Roy v. A.T. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff: Steven Roy
Defendant: A.T. Wall , Matthew Kettle , Walter Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel v. Wall
as 16-1168
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN S. MIGUEL
Respondent - Appellee: A.T. WALL, Director of R.I. Department of Corrections
Dantzler v. State of RI, et al
as 15-2472
Plaintiff - Appellant: KELVIN DANTZLER
Defendant - Appellee: A.T. WALL, ADULT CORRECTIONAL and STATE OF RI
Arnold v. Wall, et al
as 15-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL WAYNE ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee: A.T. WALL, Rhode Island State Prison Director, GASS, Prison Guard, JANKOWSKI and others
Turner v. Wall, et al
as 15-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant: WAYMAN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee: A.T. WALL, RI, D.O.C. Director, JOSEPH DINITTO, RI, D.O.C Associate Director for Classification and JAMES WEEDEN
Defendant: DAVID MCCAULEY, RI, D.O.C. Assistant Director
Turner v. Wall, et al
as 15-1422
Plaintiff - Appellant: WAYMAN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee: A.T. WALL, RI, D.O.C. Director, DAVID MCCAULEY, RI, D.O.C. Assistant Director, JOSEPH DINITTO, RI, D.O.C Associate Director for Classification and others
Kholi v. Wall, et al
as 15-1315
Petitioner - Appellant: KHALIL KHOLI
Respondent - Appellee: A.T. WALL and STATE OF RI
Paiva v. State of RI et al
as 1:2014cv00211
Petitioner: David Paiva
Defendant: State of RI, John McBurney and A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00196
Plaintiff: Wayman Turner
Defendant: A.T. Wall, David McCauley and Joseph DiNitto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Wall
as 14-1230
Petitioner - Appellant: JEFFERY S. WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee: A.T. WALL, Director of the Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?