Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-17172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, S. HOLLEMBACK, A. W., SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, A.W. and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-17142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, S. HOLLEMBACK, A. W., SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, A.W. and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-16280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, S. HOLLEMBACK, A. W., SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, A.W. and others
Vincente Ortiz v. Beno A.W. MDC Los Angeles Metro Detention Center
as 2:2009cv03023
Plaintiff:
Vincente Ortiz
Defendant:
Beno A.W. MDC Los Angeles Metro Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Keenan Hurt v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
Keenan Hurt
Defendant:
Dinnis Smith, Dinnis Smith, Dinnis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roberts v. Apker et al
as 4:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
James Dirk Roberts
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Winn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Solomon v. Felker et al
as 2:2008cv02544
Plaintiff:
Vincent Solomon
Defendant:
T. Felker, CDCR, S. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. CSP Solano, et al.,
as 2:2008cv00620
Plaintiff:
David E. Edwards
Defendant:
CSP Solano, Sisto, A.W. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellenburg v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2007cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellenburg
Defendant:
Mike Mahoney, A.W. Beason, Ken Cozby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01500
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Moreno
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
