Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 171
DELIBERALI v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02682
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, SELBY BATTERSBY AND COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: TULLIO L. DELIBERALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PINE v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01801
Plaintiff: LYDIA PINE
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. , BAYER CROPSCIENCE, BENJAMIN FOSTER DIVISION and others
Cross_claimant: A.W. CHESTERTON, INC.
Cross_defendant: BAYER CROPSCIENCE, BENJAMIN FOSTER DIVISION, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant: KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff: LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant: AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant: PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Janis, Jr. et al v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00167
Plaintiff: Earl Janis, Jr. and Toni Janis
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: DAP, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: DAP, Inc., A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HEDRICK et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00476
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEDRICK and CAROL HEDRICK
Defendant: A.O. SMITH CORP , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. , EATON CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant: A.O. SMITH CORP , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KORCUBA v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv03332
Plaintiff: PRISCILLA S. KORCUBA
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. and others
Cross_claimant: NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY , OWENS-ILLINOIS and AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Cross_defendant: NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maclachlan et al v. General Electric Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv10001
Defendant: BMI Refractory Services, Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC, General Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Donald Maclachlan and Pat Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Maclachlan et al v. 3M et al
as 1:2014cv10001
Defendant: Zurn Industries, Inc., General Refractories Company, (1 - 100) John Does and others
Plaintiff: Pat Maclachlan
Cross Claimant: Oakfabco, Inc. and George V. Hamilton, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Donald Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
James E. Joyner v. Crane Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1868
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES E. JOYNER
Defendant - Appellant: CRANE CO, individually and as successor to National-U.S. Radiator, is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Connecticut
Defendant: AC&R INSULATION CO., INC., ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, INC., ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?