Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Janet E Carpenter et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2020cv11797
Plaintiff:
Brian H Carpenter, Tanya D Hardin, Teri D Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Warren Pumps, LLC, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Petitioner:
Flowserve US Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Spirax Sarco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Janet E. Carpenter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11810
Plaintiff:
Janet E. Carpenter, Tanya D. Hardin, Brian H. Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Carver Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller et al v. Asbestos Corporation, LTD et al
as 3:2014cv00317
Defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Co., Asbestos Corporation, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Henry G. Miller and Laurence J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Garland v. Goulds Pumps et al
as 2:2007cv01498
Plaintiff:
Oliver Garland, Male
Defendant:
Goulds Pumps, 3M Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Russell v. Raybestos-Manhattan, et al
as 3:1999cv01822
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vern Russell
Defendant:
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Acands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
