Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Zamora v. AAP Implants, Inc
as 1:2024cv21625
Plaintiff: Marlen Zamora
Defendant: AAP IMPLANTS, INC. a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Southwind Risk Retention Group Incorporated v. AAP Transportation Incorporated
as 2:2023cv02387
Plaintiff: Southwind Risk Retention Group Incorporated
Defendant: AAP Transportation Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
AAPS v. ABIM
as 23-40423
Plaintiff / Appellant: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation, AAPS
Defendant / Appellee: American Board of Internal Medicine, ABIM, American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, ABOG, American Board of Family Medicine, ABFM and others
Forteza v. Auto Service Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00401
Plaintiff: Maricel Forteza
Defendant: Auto Service Department, US Dealer Services Inc doing business as US Auto, Palmer Administrative Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dean Webb, et al v. Sing for Service, LLC, et al
as 22-56193
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEAN WEBB, an individual and EDGAR GARCIA, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: SING FOR SERVICE, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, DBA MEPCO
Defendant: DEALER LOYALTY PROTECTION, INC., a Wyoming Corporation, AUTO KNIGHT MOTOR CLUB, INC., a California Corporation, PELICAN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DBA AAP, DBA Auto Service Department and others
Dean Webb, et al v. Pelican Investment Holdings Group, LLC, et al
as 22-56177
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEAN WEBB, an individual and EDGAR GARCIA, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: PELICAN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DBA AAP
Defendant: DEALER LOYALTY PROTECTION, INC., a Wyoming Corporation, AUTO KNIGHT MOTOR CLUB, INC., a California Corporation, THE FORTEGRA GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Dean Webb, et al v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al
as 22-56169
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEAN WEBB, an individual and EDGAR GARCIA, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: DEALER LOYALTY PROTECTION, INC., a Wyoming Corporation and RICHARD BENEVENTO, an individual and Corporate Agent
Defendant: AUTO KNIGHT MOTOR CLUB, INC., a California Corporation, PELICAN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DBA AAP, DBA Auto Service Department, THE FORTEGRA GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Dean Webb v. Auto Knight Motor Club, Inc., et al
as 22-56153
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEAN WEBB, an individual and EDGAR GARCIA, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: AUTO KNIGHT MOTOR CLUB, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant: DEALER LOYALTY PROTECTION, INC., a Wyoming Corporation, PELICAN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DBA AAP, DBA Auto Service Department, THE FORTEGRA GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04695
Plaintiff: Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, AAPING PAN Store, Airplane Model Toy Store Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Perrong v. Pelican Investment Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00594
Plaintiff: Andrew R. Perrong
Defendant: Pelican Investment Holdings, LLC doing business as AAP, Sunpath Ltd. and Seabury Asset Management LLC doing business as Mepco
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?