Cases 1 - 9 of 9
STRIPLIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
WILLIAMS STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
JILL BIDEN and ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaren Williams Striplin v. Los Angeles Police Department
as 2:2021cv05675
Plaintiff:
Aaren Williams Striplin
Defendant:
Los Angeles Police Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Aaren Williams-Striplin v. FBI, et al
as 17-5151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aaren Williams-Striplin
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of FBI Washington DC Field Office, FBI Police and others
WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS-STRIPLIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DIRECTOR OF FBI WASHINGTON DC FIELD OFFICE, FBI POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Striplin v. Maier
as 3:2014cv00948
Plaintiff:
Aaren Williams Striplin
Defendant:
Clare Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aaren Striplin v. Superior Court of California,, et al
as 14-15109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF WILEY, W. MANUAL COURTHOUSE, Traffic Division and SHANTELL STOKES, DMV, El Cerrito, California
Striplin v. Superior Court of California, County of Wiley et al
as 3:2012cv06417
Plaintiff:
Aaren Williams Striplin
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Wiley, W. Manual Courthouse, Traffic Division and Shantell Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Striplin v. Social Security/Supplemental Security Income
as 4:2012cv06418
Plaintiff:
Aaren Williams Striplin
Defendant:
Social Security/Supplemental Security Income
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
