Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Shaheryar Khan v. Adam Kraemer et al
as 2:2022cv02333
Plaintiff:
Shaheryar Khan
Defendant:
Adam Kraemer, Kent Seaton, Edward Charles Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Gould v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Eric Steven Gould
Defendant:
Wilbert Tucker, Laurie Marino, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Marshall v. Sue Summerset, et al
as 11-55155
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
SUE SUMMERSET, KELLOGG, AUSTIN QUALITY CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
James Earl Belt v. Sue Summerset et al
as 5:2010cv01613
Defendant:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Dep Kellogg and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl Belt
Clarence Demetrius Tate v. Sue Summerset et al
as 5:2010cv01561
Defendant:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Kellogg Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate
William A. Marshall v. Sue Summerset et al
as 5:2010cv01171
Respondent:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Dep Kellogg and others
Petitioner:
WIlliam A. Marshall
Shawn Monroe v. Sue Summerset, et al
as 5:2010cv01155
Defendant:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Dep Kellogg and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Monroe
Marshall v. Summerset et al
as 3:2010cv01449
Petitioner:
William A. Marshall
Respondent:
Sue Summerset, Kellogg, Austin Quality Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walter Brown Jr v. Sue Summerset et al
as 5:2010cv00984
Defendant:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Kellog and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Brown, Jr
David Newman v. Sue Summerset et al
as 5:2010cv00981
Defendant:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Kellogg Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Newman, -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
