Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Oscar Dantzler v. Tangipahoa Parish School Boar, et al
as 20-5344
Defendant / Appellee: Jerry Moore, Individually and In His Capacity as the Board Member, Melissa Stilley, Individually and In Her Capacity as the Superintendent, Janic Fultz Richards, Individually and In Her Capacity as the Board Member and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
Abrams v. Carranza
as 20-3899
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jhoana Juca, Individually as Parent and Natural Guardian of K.A., Piedad Angamarca, Individually as Parent and Natural Guardian of J.G., Vinnie Penna, Individually as Parent and Natural Guardian of E.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Richard Carranza, in his official capacity as the Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education and New York City Department of Education
Christopher Lancaster v. USDC-CARIV
as 17-73003
: In re: CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest: UNKNOWN MALE NURSE, individual & official capacity, PRICE, individual, PRICE, Nurse-official capacity and others
In re Eros International Secur
as 17-3415
Plaintiff: Vladimir Maliarov, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mathew Abram, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jawed Arsani and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Fred Eisner and Strahinja Ivosevic
Defendant - Appellee: Eros International PLC, Jyoti Deshpande, Andrew Heffernan and others
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC and others
Spencer Abrams, et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al
as 17-80001
Plaintiff - Respondent: SPENCER ABRAMS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., LONNIE M. SMITH, GARY S. GUTHART and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAW PROFESSORS and FORMER SEC OFFICIALS
Walter v. The State of New York
as 13-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant: Margarita T. Walter
Defendant - Appellee: The State of New York, The Office of Court Administration of The Unified Court System of The State of New York, Hon. Judge Jonathan Lippman, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4103
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bessie Jones v. City of Cincinnati, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-4174
Plaintiff - Appellee: BESSIE JONES, Administratix of the Estate on behalf of Nathaniel Jeffrey Jones
Defendant: CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al.
Defendant - Appellant: GUY ABRAMS, individually and in his official capacity (Police Officer, Cincinnati Police Division), JAMES PIKE, individually and in his official capacity (Police Officer, Cincinnati Police Division), JOEHONNY REESE, individually and in his official capacity (Police Officer, Cincinnati Police Division) and others
Deirdre Glascoe v. Prince George's County, MD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2257
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEIRDRE C. GLASCOE
Defendant - Appellee: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, JACK B. JOHNSON, Individually and in his official capacity, MARTIN O"MALLEY, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Jones v. Cincinnati, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-4528
Plaintiff - Appellee: BESSIE JONES, Administratix of the Estate on behalf of Nathaniel Jeffrey Jones
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF CINCINNATI, THOMAS STREITCHER, JR., in his official capacity, Chief of Police, City of Cincinnati, VALARIE LEMMIE, in her official capacity, City Manager, City of Cincinnati and others
Defendant: ROBERT WRIGHT, et al.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?