Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carbajal Acevedo v. McCalla et al
as 1:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Jamie Alberts Carbajal Acevedo
Defendant:
Tracy Ann McCalla and Handyman At Your Command LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Palma et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01090
Plaintiff:
Lilian Palma, Hernan Palma, D. Palma and others
Defendant:
Chief Marcus Jones, Officer Sean Petty, Deputy John-Luke Espinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01469
Petitioner:
Leandro Acevedo Lozada
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Partlow v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2019cv01048
Plaintiff:
Tavon Jamaal Partlow, Sr.
Defendant:
Shannon Scott, R. Acevedo, Sarah Rothwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Acevedo et al v. Phoenix Preservation Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv03726
Plaintiff:
Jose Maximiliano Acevedo , Oscar Cifuentes Barrientos and Josue Cifuentes Barrientos
Defendant:
Phoenix Preservation Group, Inc., Beverley Foster-Okoro and Lambert Okoro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Feliciano v. Crowder et al
as 1:2013cv00629
Plaintiff:
Gary W Feliciano
Defendant:
Tyrone Crowder, Ariel Acevedo, Joi Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. State of Maryland
as 1:2012cv03246
Petitioner:
Michael Acevedo
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sepulveda et al v. Allen Family Foods, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sanjuanita Sepulveda, Sanjuanita Sepulveda, Angela Salinas and others
Defendant:
Allen Family Foods, Inc.
Claimant:
Nora L. Alvarado, Luis Rivera Flecha, Alejandro Tzum Vicente and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
