Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Adam Branton v. United States
as 23-2350
Petitioner / Appellant:
Adam Brent Branton
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Branton v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Adam Brent Branton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wallace v. Nix et al
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Defendant:
Unknown Nix, Unknown Robinson and Floyd Spotts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00049
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Adam Branton
as 21-1459
Defendant / Appellant:
Adam Brent Branton
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Wallace v. Lamar County Jail Workers et al
as 2:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Medical Doctor John Doe, Lamar County Jail Workers, Lamar County and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tilley
as 2:2020cv00131
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Defendant:
Laura L. Tilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tilley
as 1:2020cv00246
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Defendant:
Laura L. Tilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Lamar County Jail Workers et al
as 2:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Lamar County Jail Workers and Lamar County
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Robinson et al
as 3:2019cv00726
Defendant:
Sean Smith, State of Mississippi, Unknown Robinson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
