Cases filed in Tennessee
SocialCoaster, Inc. v. ADME (CY) LTD
as 3:2024cv00404
Plaintiff: SocialCoaster, Inc. doing business as BVIRAL
Defendant: ADME (CY) LTD doing business as TheSoul Publishing
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
United States of America v. ADM et al
as 2:2023cv02407
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Christopher L Bailey
Garnishee: ADM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Dotson v. Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00099
Petitioner: Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Respondent: Daron Hall, Tony Wilkes, Adm. Joseph (l/n/u) and others
Defendant: Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00189
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hayes v. United States Treasury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02297
Plaintiff: Anthony -Decarlo: Hayes, Sr.
Defendant: United States Treasury, IRS, Timothy Geithner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00069
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bond v. ADM Milling Co.
as 1:2010cv01019
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Bond
Defendant: ADM Milling Co.
Miscellaneou: Judy Barnhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Peebles v. ADM Southern Cellulose
as 1:2006cv00228
Plaintiff: Eddie Steven Peebles
Defendant: ADM Southern Cellulose, ADM Southern Cellulose and ADM Southern Cellulose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Newbern et al v. Biggerstaff et al
as 1:2007cv01044
Plaintiff: John Newbern, John Newbern, Harriet Newbern and others
Defendant: Roy Biggerstaff, Roy Biggerstaff, ADM Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?