Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Owen-Williams v. Higgs Jr., Esq. et al
as 8:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen- Williams, II
Defendant:
Michael L Higgs Jr., Esq., Katja Bullock, Rakeshkumar "Dwight&qu Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen-Williams v. The State of Maryland
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owen-Williams v. Kwarciany et al
as 8:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Kwarciany and Montgomery County Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owen-Williams v. Higgs et al
as 8:2015cv01811
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, II
Defendant:
Michael Higgs, Esq., Katja Bullock, Rakeshkumar "Dwight&qu Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COLLINS et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
FLOYD J. COLLINS and ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Owen-Williams v. Anne Arundel County Circuit Court
as 1:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adol Owen-Williams, Jr. v. Christopher Cyran
as 14-1128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CYRAN, (#7816) and CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, INCORPORATED
Adol Owen-Williams, Jr. v. Christopher Cyran
as 12-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CYRAN, (#7816) and CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, INCORPORATED
Owen-Williams v. Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration et al
as 8:2012cv01828
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration and Jonathan Acton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen-Williams v. Cyran et al
as 8:2011cv03354
Plaintiff:
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Cyran and City of Gaithersburg, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
