Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garland v. New York City Fire Department
as 23-663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Garland, Vincent Bottalico, Timothy A. Heaton and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Fire Department, Daniel A. Nigro, John Doe #1-10 and others
Defendant:
Uniformed Fire Officers Association, Local 854 International Association of Firefighters, Affiliated with the AFL-CIO and Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York
Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL v. City of New York
as 22-3099
Petitioner:
Local 3621, EMS Officers Union, DC-37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, individually and on behalf of its members, Renae Mascol, on behalf of herself and all other similarly-situated individuals and Luis Rodriguez, on behalf of himself and all other similarly-situated individuals
Respondent:
City of New York, New York City Fire Department, Department of Citywide Administrative Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-437
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL - CIO, John Dellio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millan, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Howard P. Milstein, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of New York State Thruway/Canal Corporation Board of Directors and others
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-435
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, William Coleman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millian, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation;, Brian U. Stratton, in his official capacity as Director of the New York State Canal Corporation and others
Garland et al v. New York City Fire Department et al
as 1:2021cv06586
Plaintiff:
John Garland, Vincent A Bottalico, Timothy A Heaton and others
Defendant:
New York City Fire Department, Daniel A Nigro, John Doe #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AFSCME Council 4 et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv01524
Plaintiff:
AFSCME Council 4, Connecticut Police and Fire Union, National Association of Government Employees, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mason et al v. District Council 1707, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (DC 1707, AFSCME) et al
as 1:2021cv09382
Plaintiff:
Janice Mason, Thomas Murray, Rafael Sencion and others
Defendant:
District Council 1707, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (DC 1707, AFSCME) and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bennett v. County of Rockland
as 21-2597
Plaintiff:
Heather Bennett, William Bennett, Ann Cole-Hatchard and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Laureen Connelly, Donna Delarm, Jill Donovan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
County of Rockland and Kathleen Tower-Bernstein, in her individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
