Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Aslami v. Leblanc
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Aslami
Defendant:
Katherine Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Irshad v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 4:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Irshad
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company doing business as Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Dualle
as 6:2023cv03300
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Fuad Ahmad Dualle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Barlow v. Pizza Hut of America, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
KAREN BARLOW
Defendant:
PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA, LLC, MEC MO HOLDINGS, LLC F/K/A AHMAD MO HOLDINGS, LLC, MEM MO Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barlow v. Pizza Hut of America, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
MEM MO Holdings, LLC, Pizza Hut of America, LLC and Ahmad MO Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Karen Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
