Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Daker v. Deal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03856
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Brian Kemp, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-13964
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00289
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00179
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Edwin Windelberg v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 14-11461
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWIN WINDELBERG
Defendant - Appellee: GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, ALBERT R. MURRAY and others
Hill v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv04276
Plaintiff: Robert Hill
Defendant: State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windelberg v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv02606
Plaintiff: Edwin Windelberg
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Ga. Pardons & Paroles Members, Albert R. Murray and others
MOSES v. LAMB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00122
Plaintiff: ANTONIO LEON MOSES
Defendant: L LAMB, JAMES E DONALD, ALBERT R. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Murray et al
as 3:2013cv00004
Plaintiff: Randall Mitchell
Defendant: Albert R. Murray and Laquantra Smith
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff: Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant: Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?