Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Rodriguez Guerrero v. Herrera et al
as 1:2024cv20295
Plaintiff:
Jesus Alberto Rodriguez Guerrero and Jesus Alberto Rodriguez Guerrero doing business as Motors y Boats Del Estrecho, SL
Defendant:
Diego Herrera and Unknown Persons in Possesion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Rodriguez v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv24828
Plaintiff:
Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24225
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv35121
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24925
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez-Arriaga v. Garland
as 22-615
Petitioner:
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ-ARRIAGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosa Alberto-Rodriguez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2488
Petitioner:
Rosa Elia Alberto-Rodriguez and B.R.L.A.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Alberto Rodriguez v. Raoul Guzman et al
as 2:2023cv02715
Plaintiff:
Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
Raoul Guzman, Yessenia Farias and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Rodriguez Sanchez v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez Sanchez
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
