Cases 11 - 20 of 111
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64143
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44436
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Medina-Rios
as 21-50725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Medina-Rios, also known as Alejandro Rodriguez-Villa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31134
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24865
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Brown
as 2:2021cv02099
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant:
Macon County Jail and Antonio D Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Juan Rodriguez Cuya
as 20-13957
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ CUYA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-55770
Respondent:
NGUYEN, Officer-in-Charge, Theo Lacy Facility, DAVID MARIN, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, LUKE SOUTH, Commander, Theo Lacy Facility and others
Petitioner:
JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO, YUSSUF ABDIKADIR, ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ and others
United States of America v. Hartley (Sanders)
as 20-2130
Defendant:
Maurice Hartley, AKA Bugz, Tyvann Barnett, AKA Ty, Marie Palumbo and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Reginald Sanders, AKA Black
Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
