Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,699
Rivera Orellana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1747
Petitioner: ANGEL MAURICIO RIVERA ORELLANA, HELEN YAMILETH CEBILLA DIAZ and MAURICIO ALEXANDER RIVERA CEBILLA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gee v. Burton et al
as 3:2024cv05219
Plaintiff: Kassidy Jo Gee
Defendant: Alicia M Burton, Alexander James Bossinas, Jr, Constance R White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Favor v. Harper
as 24-1694
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: ANTHONY HARPER
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Madrid Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1548
Petitioner: GIGSI PAOLA MADRID HERNANDEZ, ARJEN ALEXANDER MEJIA MADRID, SOFIA MONSERRAT AVELAR MADRID and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alexander v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00354
Petitioner: Kevion Maurice Alexander
Respondent: Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Motivar Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner: STEFANY MOTIVAR GONZALEZ, YIMMI ALEXANDER ROBALLO PAYARES, EDDIE SANTIAGO ARANGO MOTIVAR and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Prado-Majano v. Garland
as 24-1459
Petitioner: MOISES ALEXANDER PRADO-MAJANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Frances Enyart et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00526
Plaintiff: Frances Enyart, Gregory Enyart and A. E.
Defendant: County of San Bernardino, Angel Alvarado, Andres Zavala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liam Alexander v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01955
Plaintiff: Liam Alexander
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?