Cases 11 - 20 of 4,723
Panelli v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Alexander Panelli
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Xen Saquic, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2929
Petitioner:
JOSSELINE CLARISA XEN SAQUIC and MANUEL ESTEBAN ALEXANDER CONOZ XEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Blue Water Petroleum Corp. v. Atakam Group Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Defendant:
Andrew Osichnuk, Atakam Group Inc., Andrei Osichnuk and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Water Petroleum Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Blue Water Petroleum Corp. v. Atakam Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Blue Water Petroleum Corp.
Defendant:
Atakam Group Inc., Andrew Osichnuk aka Andrei Osichnuk and Alexander Dekhtyar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Segovia-Coreas v. Garland
as 24-2823
Petitioner:
DARWIN ALEXANDER SEGOVIA-COREAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
