Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,296
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant: LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: JO BENNETT
Defendant: SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Salisbury v. Alexander et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: Lloyd Salisbury
Defendant: Roderick Dante Alexander and Benin Logistics Group LLC
Other: Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WEI v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff: Wei Wei
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, alexander mayorkas, ur m jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
ALEXANDER v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2024cv00391
Petitioner: TYRONE ALEXANDER and TYRONE S. ALEXANDER
Respondent: MARTIN HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ros Lazo v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner: Alexander Ros Lazo
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Wapinsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Alexander Williams
Defendant: Warden Wapinsky and C.O. Donalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRUNO v. ROUNDHOUSE CYCLES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER BRUNO
Defendant: ROUNDHOUSE CYCLES, INC. doing business as ROUNDHOUSE HARLEY-DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SCOTT v. SUPERINTENDENT HOUSER et al
as 2:2023cv05117
Petitioner: ALEXANDER SCOTT
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?