Cases 31 - 40 of 478
Alexander v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03258
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Alexander
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Teresa R. O'Brien and Chairman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03259
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Alexander Lane
Defendant:
Billy Cooper, Charles Cooper, Officer Dzukiti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Alexander
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. YADKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC ALEXANDER
Defendant:
YADKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, EDDIE BUFFALO, Sgt. A. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00717
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN ALEXANDER MILLS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
AMERSON v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
PIERRE ALEXANDER AMERSON
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and TIMOTHY D. MOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARGETT v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER HARGETT
Defendant:
AMY COLLINS, DANIEL HEADRIX, NORMA BLACKSHEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Honeycutt, FNU Farrish, Timothy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
