Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 8:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C Miller, Reagan Frincks Maye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Henry Acosta-Bonilla
as 18-40802
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HENRY ALEXY ACOSTA-BONILLA
Acosta-Guzman v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Alexis Acosta-Guzman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
West Morgan - East Lawrence v. Charles Owens, et al
as 17-12381
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHARLES OWENS, ANGELIA ABBASI, MOHAMMAD ABBASI and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEST MORGAN-EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, TOMMY LINDSEY, LANETTE LINDSEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, DYNEON, LLC and DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.
:
SERVICE
Owens et al v. 3M Company, Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00346
Plaintiff:
Charles Owens , Alexis Acosta , Vanessa Acosta and others
Defendant:
3M Company Inc , Daikin America Inc and Dyneon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Alexis Acosta-Guzman
as 16-40152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEXIS ACOSTA-GUZMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
