Cases 11 - 18 of 18
United States of America et al v. AC Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09931
Defendant:
A.G. Layne, Inc., AC Products, Inc., Alpha Corporation of Tennessee Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of California, Department of Toxic Substances Control
202) 616-2427 (fax:
United States of America
Ayling et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 2:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Robin E. Ayling and Corey J. Ayling
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , Zeta Rho Corporation and Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chenier v. Hoopes et al
as 4:2012cv00590
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chenier
Defendant:
James John Hoopes , B & J Management and The Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chenier v. Hoopes et al
as 1:2012cv07286
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chenier
Defendant:
James John Hoopes , B & J Management and The Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Gregush et al v. Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation
as 2:2009cv03645
Plaintiff:
Roger E. Gregush, Roger E. Gregush, Eugene Gregush and others
Defendant:
Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Kevin Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin v. Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv03430
Plaintiff:
Matthew Martin and Matthew Martin
Defendant:
Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Oded P. Nissim and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. AC Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv06881
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
AC Products, Inc., A.G. Layne, Inc., AdvancePCS Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOUSE et al v. RIVIERA TRADING INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03427
Plaintiff:
RUBY L. DOUSE, EDITH M. SUMMERS, MARY E. KING and others
Defendant:
RIVIERA TRADING INC., STYL MARK, INC., WAFRA INVESTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
