Cases 1 - 10 of 952
Back Story, LLC dba Golfforever v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03717
Plaintiff:
Back Story, LLC dba Golfforever
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and International Golf Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SoundClear Technologies LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SoundClear Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC and Amazon Web Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1739
Plaintiff:
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE and CF DYNAMIC ADVANCES LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE and CF DYNAMIC ADVANCES LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Ceiva Opco, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1721
Plaintiff:
CEIVA OPCO, LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
WFR IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
WFR IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Charles v. AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
as 5:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Bibbs A Charles
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Charles A. Bibbs v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Charles A Bibbs
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Harris v. Page Publishing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02738
Plaintiff:
Mable Harris
Defendant:
Page Publishing, Inc., Google, LLC and Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Factor2 Multimedia Systems, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Factor2 Multimedia Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
