Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
John McPherson, Rosemary Arias, Sean Burke and others
Defendant:
Wynndalco Enterprises, LLC, Hoan Ton-That, Jose Flores and others
In Re:
Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
Duke Law First Amendment Clinic, Professor Eugene Volokh, Professor Jane Bambauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Gear, Sylvia et al v. Knudson, Dean et al
as 3:2020cv00278
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ginter, Wisconsin Alliance for Retired Americans, Malekeh K. Hakami and others
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Meagan Wolfe, Ann S. Jacobs and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Racine, Tony Evers, Dane County and others
Intervenor:
Wisconsin State Legislature
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis, Greg et al v. Knudson, Dean et al
as 3:2020cv00284
Plaintiff:
Souls to the Polls, Reverend Greg Lewis, Black Leaders Organizing for Communities and others
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Meagan Wolfe and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Racine, Tony Evers, Dane County and others
Intervenor:
Wisconsin State Legislature
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Democratic National Committee et al v. Bostelmann, Marge et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
Democratic National Committee and Democratic Party of Wisconsin
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Ann S. Jacobs and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Racine, Tony Evers, Dane County and others
Intervenor:
Wisconsin State Legislature
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook County, Illinois et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv06334
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI II, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency and others
Plaintiff:
Cook County, Illinois, an Illinois governmental entity, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc. and Cook County, Illinois
Amicus Curiae:
Nevada Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence, Sexual Violence Law Center, Equip for Equality and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv02768
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois , American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana , American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. Indiana Secretary of State, et al
as 17-1356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, INC., doing business as AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF INDIANA
Defendant - Appellant:
INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, in her official capacity, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA ELECTION COMMISSION, in their official capacities and SUPERINTENDENT OF THE INDIANA STATE POLICE, in his official capacity
Harlan et al v. Scholz et al
as 1:2016cv07832
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harlan and Crawford County Republican Central Committee
Defendant:
Charles W. Scholz , Ernest L. Gowen , Betty J. Coffrin and others
Intervenor_defendant:
David Orr
Amicu:
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Chicago , Action Now Institute , CHANGE Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
