Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Valle v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Delfino Valle
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., RSI Home Products Manufacturing, Inc., RSI Home Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ashley Boguett v. American Woodmark Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv01983
Plaintiff:
Ashley Boguett
Defendant:
American Woodmark Corporation, RSI Home Products, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jeff Patterson v. American Woodmark Corporation, et al
as 20-56038
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT, INC. and AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFF PATTERSON
Christopher J. Rodriguez v. RSI Home Products, Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv00138
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Rodriguez
Defendant:
RSI Professional Cabinet Solutions, PROFESSIONAL CABINET SOLUTIONS, RSI HOME PRODUCTS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jeff Patterson v. American Woodmark Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09728
Defendant:
American Woodmark Corporation and The Home Depot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeff Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rachal v. American Woodmark Corporation
as 3:2016cv08046
Plaintiff:
Roy Rachal
Defendant:
American Woodmark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rachal v. American Woodmark Corporation
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
Roy Rachal
Defendant:
American Woodmark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
