Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sussex Holdings, Inc. v. Wood, et al
as 1:2017mc00243
Petitioner:
Sussex Holdings, Inc.
Respondent:
Charles David Wood, Jr. , AMS Staff Leasing II, Inc. , AMS Staff Leasing, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Wood et al
as 3:2017cv00514
Plaintiff:
Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles David Wood, Jr., AMS Staff Leasing, Inc., Breckenridge Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Companion Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Charles David Wood, Jr et al
as 3:2016mc00075
Plaintiff:
Companion Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
AMS Staff Leasing II Inc, Charles David Wood, Jr, Breckenridge Enterprises Inc and others
Movant:
Highpoint Administrative Services Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Companion Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. All Roof Systems, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv01097
Plaintiff:
Companion Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
All Roof Systems, LLC, AMS Staff Leasing Corporation, Andrew N. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Wood et al
as 3:2014cv03719
Plaintiff:
Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles David Wood, Jr, AMS Staff Leasing, Inc., Breckenridge Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Peralta v. LG Property Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv20653
Plaintiff:
Raul Peralta
Defendant:
LG Property Maintenance, Inc., Lazaro Ravelo, Zonia Lorenzo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
