Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Chen v. Martuscello et al
as 6:2025cv06531
Plaintiff:
John Chen
Defendant:
Danial Martuscello, Amy Cook and Tammy Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2025cv00468
Plaintiff:
Eric Daugherty, Jeff Pierce, Jordan Pocobello and others
Defendant:
The State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ali v. Cook
as 9:2024cv01521
Petitioner:
Abdul N. Ali
Respondent:
Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joyce v. Trans Union, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03344
Plaintiff:
Ann Joyce
Defendant:
Trans Union, LLC and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Joyce v. Trans Union, LLC et al
as 2:2024at01521
Plaintiff:
Ann Joyce
Defendant:
Amy Cook and Trans Union, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Pierre-Lys v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Roodolph L. Pierre-Lys
Respondent:
State of New York and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooper v. Cook
as 9:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Jordon Hooper
Respondent:
Amy Cook, St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, St. Lawrence County Supreme Court District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Cook
as 1:2024cv01655
Petitioner:
Robert Brown
Respondent:
Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Black et al
as 3:2023cv04934
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook
Defendant:
Steven D. Black, Mark A. Chancy, Celeste A. Clarke and others
Petitioner:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund and Jose F. Isais
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.