Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: CHRISTHOPER HOLCOMB, VARTHEL, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff: LESLIE JOHNSON
Defendant: NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OGLE v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff: BRYAN A. OGLE
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, RICHARD BROWN, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNIGAN v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2021cv00311
Plaintiff: LEE EVANS DUNIGAN
Defendant: NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner: MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent: DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. PEORISON et al
as 2:2021cv00191
Defendant: D. FIRESTONE, MYER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff: JAMIE R. GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?