Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bailey v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2026cv04599
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bailey
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Roderick M. Smith and Andre Dickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shakeyra Bradley v. Fulton County Board of Assessors, et al
as 26-12425
Plaintiff:
SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSORS, Kate Ingred, FULTON COUNTY TAX COMMISSIONER, FULTON COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE and others
Lee v. Mayfield et al
as 1:2026cv02256
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Cedra Mayfield, Real Broker, LLC, Rebekah Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lee v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2026cv02168
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Fani Willis, Andre Dickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lee v. Pichai et al
as 1:2026cv02140
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Sundar Pichai, Hideaki Nishino, Google and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. Saporito et al
as 1:2026cv02141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Todd J. Saporito, Flex Spas, Ann Ogalu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Dickens et al
as 1:2025cv05398
Plaintiff:
Raymond Washington
Defendant:
Andre Dickens, Doug Shipmen, David Hollomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2025cv04240
Plaintiff:
Angela Y. Dawson and Alvin L. Kendall
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia and Mayor Andre Dickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danny Valentine Shabazz v. Sovereign Sweets, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN SWEETS, VINCENT WATSON, ANDRE DICKENS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
