Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Johnson v. Frankenberg
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
David Frankenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
JOHNSON et al v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2023cv05154
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON, AMUUR MATIYN ZAAKIR EL TRUST, ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON ET AL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS HOLBROOK doing business as THOMAS HOLBROOK, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY C HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, EZIKE NGO D/B/A EZIKE BGO: ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as EZIKE NGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Misty Dawn Hillard Trust et al v. Crudup et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Misty Dawn Hillard Trust, Amuur Matiyn El Trust and Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
Moneisha Crudup doing business as Moneisha Crudup, Vice President of Truist f/k/a Suntrust and William Rogers doing business as William Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Truist, f/k/a Suntrust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Charles Rettig, Marsha Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Rettig et al
as 3:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Trey Hargett, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Johnson v. Charles Rettig, et al
as 21-5648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service, TERRY HARGETT, Tennessee Secretary of State, JANET YELLEN, Treasury Secretary of the United States and others
Johnson v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00097
Claimant:
Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
