Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Farrier v. Naphcare Inc., et al
as 15-1709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD FARRIER
Defendant - Appellee:
NAPHCARE INC., GERALD HORGAN, YOLANDA SMITH and others
Tuitt v. Spencer
as 1:2015cv10667
Plaintiff:
Michael Tuitt
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Mark A Cutler, Eric Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis, et al v. Village Gun Shop, Inc.
as 14-2249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JARVIS, COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., RUSSELL JARVIS and others
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and DANIEL J. BENNETT, in his official capacity as Massachusetts Secretary of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE GUN SHOP, INC., d/b/a Village Vault
Interested Party:
ANDREA CABRAL, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security
Crotty v. Wall et al
as 4:2014cv40160
Plaintiff:
Richard Crotty
Defendant:
Josh Wall, Andrea Cabral and Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Patrick et al
as 1:2013cv12513
Plaintiff:
Eric Kelley
Defendant:
Deval Patrick, Tim Murray, Andrea Cabral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacDonald v. Cabral et al
as 1:2012cv11056
Plaintiff:
Timothy MacDonald
Defendant:
Andrea Cabral, Gerard Horgan, John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell vs Cabral
as 1:2012cv10744
Petitioner:
Aaron Powell
Respondent:
Andrea Cabral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Merlino v. Cabral et al
as 1:2012cv10339
Petitioner:
Frank Merlino
Respondent:
Andrea Cabral and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
