Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Urvashi Bhagat v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
as 23-1055
Plaintiff / Appellant: URVASHI BHAGAT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREI IANCU, in his official capacity as Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and KATHI VIDAL, in her official capacity as Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
RoboLaw Corporation v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv01526
Defendant: Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: ROBOLAW CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Bhagat v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01515
Defendant: Andrei Iancu and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff: Urvashi Bhagat
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Nomula v. Iancu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01417
Defendant: Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: Mr. Jagadeshwar Reddy Nomula and Jagadeshwar Reddy Nomula
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv01379
Defendant: Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant: Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv01233
Defendant: Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
SawStop Holding LLC v. Iancu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01212
Defendant: Hon. Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: SawStop Holding LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv00990
Defendant: Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv00983
Defendant: Andrei Iancu and Andrew Hirshfeld
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?