Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,441
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10203
Plaintiff: DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant: TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant: Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Owens
as 1:2024cv00286
Petitioner: Andrew Thurston Murphy
Respondent: Craig D. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner: THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent: WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Kister v. Maria Wynn, et al
as 24-10192
Plaintiff: JOHN ANDREW KISTER
Defendant: MARIA WYNN, TAHIR SIDDIQ, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
MITCHELL v. LAVORADO et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant: M LAVORADO, DAIQUIRI DUNCAN, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley Fox v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10146
Petitioner: WESLEY ANDREW FOX
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
ANDREWS v. DIXON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: JOHN ANDREWS
Defendant: RICKY DIXON and WARDEN OF APALACHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Trevino v. Kenneth Andrews
as 24-10124
Plaintiff: DANIEL TREVINO
Defendant: KENNETH E. ANDREWS
Clark v. McFarlene et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff: Major Anthony Clark
Defendant: Andrew McFarlene, Lt. Griffin, Cert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?