Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Smith v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tolbert Smith
Defendant:
Judge Mikell Scarborough, Charles Tolbert, Keith L. Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bolovis v. The City of Charleston Fire Department et al
as 2:2023cv05902
Plaintiff:
George Bolovis
Defendant:
The City of Charleston Fire Department, Andrew Webb, William Haigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hannigan et al v. Rice et al
as 6:2023cv05529
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hannigan and Brittany Hannigan
Defendant:
Andrew Rice and School District of Greenville County, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McElrath v. Zuckerberg et al
as 8:2023cv03718
Plaintiff:
Andrew Marshall McElrath
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Quest Inc and Facebook Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
